Five months after their unexpected offensive into Russian territory, Ukrainian forces are facing escalating challenges in the Kursk region. With mounting casualties and stretched resources, some question the strategic value of holding onto this contested area, while others view it as crucial to Ukraine’s larger war efforts.

Struggles on the Frontlines

The battles in Kursk have become increasingly intense, leaving some Ukrainian commanders unable to evacuate the dead. Communication gaps and poorly timed strategies have led to significant losses, according to front-line soldiers and commanders who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Since the surprise Ukrainian incursion in August, Russia has deployed over 50,000 troops, including reinforcements from North Korea. Moscow's counterattack has been devastating, with thousands of Ukrainian troops killed or wounded. Ukraine has lost over 40% of the 984 square kilometers (380 square miles) it initially seized during the offensive.

Despite these losses, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has hinted at the strategic importance of Kursk, suggesting that controlling the region could strengthen Ukraine’s position in negotiating an end to the war. However, some Ukrainian and Western officials worry that committing resources to Kursk may weaken defenses across the 1,000-kilometer (621-mile) front line, particularly as Ukraine continues to lose ground in the eastern Donbas region.

From Border Raid to Prolonged Occupation

The operation in Kursk began as a calculated raid. Ukrainian officials believed Russia was preparing a new assault on northeastern Ukraine. On August 5, troops moved from Ukraine's Sumy region for what was intended to be a nine-day mission.

The initial success caught Russian forces off guard, and Ukrainians saw it as a significant morale booster. One company commander described the mission as historic, telling his troops, "We're making history; the whole world will know about us." However, the mission soon evolved into a prolonged occupation, pushing Ukrainian forces beyond their original objectives.

As Russian forces regrouped, the tide began to turn. By November, Russia was rapidly reclaiming territory. Ukrainian soldiers, once proud of their accomplishments, are now grappling with heavy losses and dwindling morale. One company commander reported that half of his troops are either dead or injured.

Challenges in Strategy and Morale

Some Ukrainian commanders have expressed frustration with the higher-ups, citing delays in communication and a lack of understanding about the situation on the ground. These delays often leave troops to make critical decisions independently.

One platoon commander highlighted the difficulty of holding defensive positions, stating that many soldiers who "stand until the end" end up missing in action. He also noted that intense battles have made it impossible to retrieve the bodies of fallen comrades without risking further casualties.

American long-range weapons have been instrumental in slowing the Russian advance, and North Korean troops recently added to Russia’s ranks have proven vulnerable to Ukrainian drone and artillery attacks. However, Ukrainian soldiers warn that these forces are adapting, using better camouflage and learning to operate near forested areas.

One critical battle unfolded last week near the Vorontsovo tract, a forested area that recently fell to Russian forces. Ukrainian troops now fear losing a vital logistics route, which could have far-reaching consequences for their defensive capabilities.

A Divided Perspective on Kursk’s Value

As Ukraine continues to endure losses in the Donbas region, some soldiers are questioning whether holding Kursk is worth the cost. However, others argue that retreating would embolden Russia to press further into Ukrainian territory.

The conflict in Kursk underscores the complexity of Ukraine’s ongoing struggle, balancing immediate survival with long-term strategic goals in its fight against Russian aggression.